Home | Print Page | Contact Us | Sign In | Register
Weekly Industry News
Blog Home All Blogs
PIA Western Alliance knows you want to be the best in the field, and the best way to stay on top is to stay informed. PIA Weekly Industry News Brief is an informative e-news brief that delivers the most relevant industry content.


Search all posts for:   


Top tags: Insurance Content  Weekly Industry News  Insurance Industry  Insurance News  Around the PIA Western Alliance States  ObamaCare  The Affordable Care Act  Healthcare  HealthCare.gov  Cyber Security  Cyber Breach  PIA Western Alliance  Cyber Insurance  Employment  jobs  flood insurance  wildfires  AIG  work  Millennials  Flood  Employees  PIA  business  Millennials & Insurance  Pia National  Taxes  Insurance  MetLife  E&O 

Cyber Attacks — Consumers Want More from Insurance

Posted By staff reporter, Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Consumers want more insurance help with their cyber woes, and potential cyber woes. The why is easy. From automobiles to interconnected homes, just about every aspect of people’s lives are impacted by technology, and that technology is a sieve and easy for hackers to access.

Take automobiles for example. Asaf Ashkenazi of the software company Inside Secure said hackers can use connectivity to access private information and can even use it to steal the car. “The worst-case scenario is that they can completely take over and control anything in your car, from the brakes to the steering wheel,” he said. “The scariest scenario is that you're driving and they make your car crash.”

Then there’s the loss of personal records. The Identity Theft Resource Center’s 2018 End of Year Data Breach Report said 447 million consumers had their personal records compromised last year. That is a 126% increase from 2017.

What’s ironic is the total number of data breaches in 2018 fell by 23%.

Paul Robinson of GreyCastle Security said, “It’s very difficult now to avoid these attacks, even if you're taking the precautionary measures, such as managing your bank account and things of that nature. Now please do that, don't neglect watching your accounts and keeping an eye on your medical records, but the horse has left the barn per se.”

Assurant’s new study, The Connected Now says the connected lifestyle isn’t connecting with everybody. This is where insurance might be helpful. More on that in a bit.

The risk management firm said like it or not, nearly 40% of consumers identify themselves as technophobes. They own an average of 1.3 connected products. These range from smartphones and computers to equipment to manage things in the home.

Those same people — or 78% of them — worry about ID theft and the compromising of their personal information. They point that worried finger at interconnectivity — connectivity they are not that happy with.

Yet, 69% do admit this technology makes their lives easier. 

This is where insurance has an opportunity to shine. Parks Associates — an Internet of Things marketing and consulting company — said its research finds that 40% to 50% of households with access to broadband Internet want additional insurance services.

Parks Associates said this applies to those who own their homes and those renting.

Of those interested, 35% want insurance services that are proactive and that communicate the potential risk of the smart devices in their homes. They want to be updated and warned ahead of time.

Parks Associates spokesman Brad Russell said the insurance they want will take care of the restoration of those services and repair their home after the damage occurs.

“A restoration service that repairs damage is the most appealing service among insured households, but there is strong interest in proactive services, which would be enabled by smart home devices and AI capabilities to detect and prevent risk situations,” he said.

And he noted that advances in technology now let the insured and the insurer connect and interact more easily than ever. “Connected devices are reshaping the way consumers think about many traditional services and how they interact with their service providers,” he added. “These trends in consumer expectations, combined with the wealth of data derived from IoT solutions, are opening significant market opportunities for the insurance industry.”


Source links: PropertyCasualty360.com, USA Today, WHEC-TV, Insurance Business America

Tags:  cyber breach  Cyber Security  insurance content  insurance news 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Around the PIA Western Alliance States

Posted By staff reporter, Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Around the PIA Western Alliance 


Uber Crash Lawsuit: Last year Elaine Herzberg was hit and killed by an autonomous vehicle owned by Uber. The suit isn’t against Uber, but against the city of Tempe.

Herzberg’s husband and daughter each want $5 million in damages and say the city of Tempe created a dangerous situation when it installed a brick pathway across the median where people aren’t supposed to be crossing.


Source link: Insurance Journal



From the Idaho Department of Insurance

A tip from a social media post helped lead to an insurance fraud conviction for a Bingham County resident.  Danielle Collins was sentenced in Bingham County District Court last week after pleading guilty to one count of insurance fraud following an investigation conducted by the Idaho Department of Insurance.

In court proceedings, Collins admitted to purchasing car insurance after damaging her vehicle.  She was placed on three years of supervised probation by Judge Darren B. Simpson and ordered to pay $800 in fines, $245 in court costs, $500 to the Public Defender’s office, and $536 in restitution to the DOI.  She also must complete 100 hours of community service.

Court records show Collins purchased an auto policy through Progressive Insurance on August 25, 2017.  Three days later she submitted a claim for an accident in which her vehicle sustained damage to its front end and both driver’s side tires.  However, Progressive officials discovered a Facebook post dated days prior to the reported date of the accident and claim submission in which Collins asked her friends and followers, “Who gets not one but two flat tires?? Meeee!!  The social media gaffe helped DOI investigators close the case against Collins.

“This is an example of how insurance fraud comes in all shapes and sizes,” said Director Dean Cameron.  “I’m proud of the work of our investigators because every case of fraud, no matter how big or small, adds up and becomes costly for all Idaho consumers.”


Medicare Workshop to be Offered in Idaho Falls

A free Medicare Workshop for individuals turning 65 and those approaching Medicare eligibility will be held Thursday, February 14, from 2 to 4 p.m. at the Idaho Falls Senior Center, 535 W. 21st St., Idaho Falls.  Caregivers and all those interested in learning how Medicare works are encouraged to attend.

The workshop will be led by Senior Health Insurance Benefits Advisors (SHIBA), a unit of the Idaho Department of Insurance.  SHIBA presenters will introduce the various parts of Medicare and explain some of the vocabulary associated with the program. 

Topics to be covered include:


  Timeframes for enrolling in Medicare

  Enrollment periods for Medigap, Medicare Advantage and Prescription Drug Plans

  How the different parts of Medicare work together – and when they don’t


To register for the workshop, please contact the SHIBA Helpline at 1-800-247-4422.



Minimum Wage

Montana Democrat Rep. Mary Ann Dunwell of Helena wants the state’s minimum wage to go up from $8.50 an hour to $15. If her bill — HB 345 — gets passed, the wage will go to $12 an hour on July 1st of this year, and rise to $15 on July 1st in 2020.

The AFL-CIO and the Montana Federation of Public Employees and the Montana Department of Labor and Industry are supporting the bill.

Opposing the bill is the Montana Retail Association and the Montana Restaurant Association.

Source link: Independent Record



Marijuana Audit

An audit done by the secretary of state’s office has found the inspections conducted in Oregon’s marijuana industry and not up to speed. The state says the testing system is weak and threatens consumers with contaminants.

Just 3% of the retailers have been inspected and just one-third of the state’s marijuana growers. Also — the report said — marijuana regulators are not doing much to address the black market sales.

However, so far, the legal pot market has generated $207 million in taxes for the state coffers.


Oregon’s Innovation Hub

The Department of Consumer and Business Services’ Division of Financial Regulation has opened its Innovation Hub to help insurance, financial, and technology companies bring innovative products, services, and tools to Oregonians.

Experts, thought leaders, and businesses are encouraged to visit dfr.oregon.gov/innovation to connect with the division’s Innovation Liaison and learn more about Oregon’s Innovation Hub.

“We want to engage and collaborate with businesses that are poised to leverage technology in a way that will benefit Oregonians.” said Andrew Stolfi, division administrator. “The Innovation Hub is here to help the businesses we regulate deliver emerging products, and services to Oregon consumers.”

The Innovation Liaison helps companies navigate regulatory guidelines in a way that enables new technology flourish within the state. The liaison helps the division develop and maintain a structure that that can adapt to innovation both now and in the future.

For more information or to connect with the Innovation Liaison visit dfr.oregon.gov/innovation



Tags:  Around the PIA Western Alliance States  insurance content  insurance industry  pia western alliance 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

M&A in 2018 — Record Setting

Posted By Staff reporter, Tuesday, February 5, 2019

OPTIS Partners is a mergers and acquisitions expert. It advises companies on how to successfully sell or merge. In a release on M&A activity for 2018, OPTIS said there were 626 deals done during the year. That’s a record.

In 2017 there were 611.

OPTIS spokesman Timothy Cunningham said the 2018 total had 330 of them done in the second half of the year. In the fourth quarter alone 148 were completed. “The M&A market for insurance agents and brokers continues to surprise and exceed expectations,” he said. “There are no signs of anything changing in the near term, either.”

Most of the transactions were sellers of property and casualty insurance, employee benefits and employee benefit agencies. Private equity and hybrid purchasers numbered 424 or 68% of the total.

Cunningham noted that’s up from 383 transactions in 2017. “The concentration of PE/hybrid buyers has grown steadily since we began tracking deals in 2008, when only 21% of the transactions involved private equity buyers,” he said.

Here are the top purchasers from 2018:

  Acisure — 101

  HUB International — 58

  AssuredPartners — 37

  Gallagher — 36

  Broadstreet Partners — 34




There were 107 transactions involving privately owned companies. That’s down from 137 in 2017 and is the first drop since 2013.

The most sellers were from property and casualty insurance agencies.

  They number 345 transactions or 55% of the total

  Employee benefits brokers were 146 or 23% of the total

  That’s down from 174 in 2017


Other findings:

  2018 had 142 unique buyers

  That’s down from 177 in 2017

  The top-10 buyers accounted for 62% of the transactions

  That’s up from 56% in 2017


Cunningham also added:

  Those wanting to buy can find attractive properties to buy

  The value of agencies is rising to levels not seen before

  Internal perpetuation is becoming a growing challenge because of rising values and the prices third-party buyers are willing to pay

“The actual number of agency acquisitions was far greater than the number reported, as many buyers and sellers do not report transactions, and some acquirers do not report small transaction,” he said.

As for the future? OPTIS Partners offered this advice:

  If you’re purchasing, watch out for cash flow and don’t overpay

  If you’re selling, find the best cultural and operational fit

  Sellers need to take care of strong pricing before it drops


Source links: Insurance Business America, PropertyCasualty360.com

Tags:  Insurance Content  OPTIS Partners is a mergers and acquisitions  Timothy Cunningham 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

An Employee Perk — Pet Insurance

Posted By Staff reporter, Tuesday, February 5, 2019

A lot of younger people are bagging the idea of having kids. Since the cost of family health insurance is quite high, a lot of employers are adding pet insurance for these childless employees.

And for other employees, too.

In fact, in the last decade or so, pet insurance has grown from a boutique benefit to the hottest growing employee benefit. In 2016, over 5,000 companies were offering pet insurance. That number has likely grown since.

Among companies offering such insurance are Microsoft, T-Mobile, Levi-Strauss, Hewlett-Packard, Xerox, Ikea and Yahoo. Nationwide’s Scott Liles said, “Since 65% of Americans own at least one pet, almost two-thirds of employees may be shouldering sizable veterinary costs.”

As business in pet insurance grows, companies writing pet insurance are trying to cut costs and are tracking what makes pets healthy and unhealthy. Not surprisingly, like with humans, obesity is a huge pet insurance problem.


Market Access

Nationwide found nearly 20% of its pet insurance claims are because of obese pets. The number of that type of claim has risen 24% in the last eight years and the cost in vet expenses has risen to $69 million.

As an exercise in helping to lower those costs, Nationwide noted the top 10 conditions that are related to — or made worse by — obesity and are encouraging pet owners to address the issue.


For dogs:


  Bladder/urinary tract disease

  Liver disease

  Low thyroid hormone

  Torn knee ligaments

  Diseased spinal disc


  Chronic kidney disease

  Heart failure

  High blood pressure


For cats:

  Bladder/urinary tract disease

  Chronic kidney disease



  Liver disease


  High blood pressure

  Heart failure

  Gall bladder disorder

  Immobility of spine

Nationwide’s Carol McConnell said, “Obesity can be detrimental to the livelihood of our pets. The new year presents a perfect opportunity to create regular exercise routines for our pets, and to effectively manage their eating habits to avoid excess weight gain. Scheduling a routine wellness exam with a veterinarian is an effective way to get started on monitoring your pet’s weight.”


Source links: Fortune, Insurance Business America

Tags:  cost of family health insurance  insurance content  pet insurance 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Around the PIA Western Alliance States

Posted By staff reporter, Tuesday, January 29, 2019



Montecito Mudslides: Edison International says poorly designed and maintained debris basins are the reasons for the deadly mudslides that hit Montecito last year.

Over 20 people died. Damages to property is estimated at between $177 million and $204 million. The mudslides happened on January 18, 2018 when the first heavy rain of the season hit the top of the mountain above the city and loosed tons of mud and boulders onto the city.

Edison International has been sued for causing the mudslides because its equipment may have been responsible for the fire at the top of the mountain. The company — and its subsidiary Southern California Edison — countersued and blamed the city, the county and its inadequate infrastructure, and how that infrastructure was maintained.

In its complaint, Edison said, “With this cross-complaint we seek to ensure that there is a comprehensive review of the role many parties may have played in the large and tragic losses suffered by the community during the Montecito mudslides,” the company said. “It is well known that the Montecito area has always been at high risk for mudslides and debris flows. We believe that city, county and state governments, including flood control, water and transportation agencies, failed to ensure that Montecito’s infrastructure was adequate to reduce the impact of such natural disasters.”


Source link: Insurance Journal



Medicare Workshops to be Offered in Bonners Ferry: A series of three (3) free Medicare Workshop for individuals turning 65 and those approaching Medicare eligibility will be held Friday, February 1 at the Fry Healthcare Education Center, located across from the main hospital building of the Boundary Community Hospital, 6640 Kaniksu St., in Bonners Ferry.  Workshops will be held at 2:30, 4:30 and 6 p.m.

Caregivers and all those interested in learning how Medicare works are encouraged to attend.

The workshop will be led by Senior Health Insurance Benefits Advisors (SHIBA), a unit of the Idaho Department of Insurance.  SHIBA presenters will introduce the various parts of Medicare and explain some of the vocabulary associated with the program. 

Topics to be covered include:

  Timeframes for enrolling in Medicare

  Enrollment periods for Medigap, Medicare Advantage and Prescription Drug Plans

  How the different parts of Medicare work together — and when they don’t

To register for the workshop, please contact the SHIBA office at 1-800-247-4422.



Wildfire Mitigation Plan: Public Lands Commissioner Hilary Franz has unveiled a 10-year, $55 billion wildfire control plan and given it to the Legislature. The plan will add 30-full time and 40 seasonal firefighters to the Department of Natural Resources. It also adds two helicopters to the firefighting air fleet.

A wildfire training academy that can be used by other agencies will also be set up.

Source link: Claims Journal


Commissioner’s Legislative Priority

Click here for Washington Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler’s legislative priorities.

Actions by the Commissioner

Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler issued fines in December 2018 totaling $192,050 against insurance companies, agents and brokers who violated state insurance regulations.

Insurance companies

Accordia Life and Annuity Co., Des Moines, Iowa; fined $130,000, order 18-0250

Kreidler received 57 complaints about the company in 2016 and 2017 and started an investigation into its practices. The law violations included:

 Failure to maintain full and adequate records of more than 8,600 customer accounts.

Underpaid interest on the death benefit of a policy and failed to correct the problem until the consumer complained to Kreidler’s office. State law requires that insurance companies pay 8 percent interest.

Failed to provide annual statements to 21 consumers.

State Farm Life Insurance Co., fined $10,000, order 18-0410

The company failed to pay the correct amount of interest on death benefits to 1,251 Washington consumers. State law requires that insurance companies pay 8 percent interest.

Kreidler fined the following companies for violating Washington state insurance regulations:

    GPM Health and Life Insurance Co., Spokane, Wash.; fined $2,000, order 18-0468

    Monterey Insurance Co., Monterey, Calif.; fined $30,000, order 18-0490

    American Automobile Insurance Co., Earth City, Mo..; fined $10,000, order 18-0494

    Unified Life Insurance Co., Dallas; fined $4,500, order 18-0529


Agents and brokers

Kreidler revoked the licenses of the following insurance producers:

  Romaine Smith, Prosser, Wash.; license revoked, order 18-0146

  Francisca Yadira Rios, Pasco, Wash.; license revoked, order 18-0507

  Jacqueline Cone, Washougal, Wash.; license revoked, order 18-0515

  Jodi S. Campbell, Lonoke, Ark.; license revoked, order 18-0475

  Gary M. Enciso, Long Beach, Calif.; license revoked, order 18-0476

  Rachel Glover, Collins, Iowa; license revoked, order 18-0477

  Drucilla Clorene Wilson, Las Vegas; license revoked, order 18-0479

  Paul B. Wells, Las Vegas, license revoked, order 18-0498

  Deandre Maze-Carter, Phoenix; license revoked, order 18-0499

  American Underwriting Services LLC, Kennesaw, Ga.; license revoked, order 18-0503

  Romeo Evan Fulton, North Riverside, Ill.; license suspended, order 18-0504

  James Luis Vasquez, Bothell, Wash.; revocation rescinded, license surrendered, order 18-0480


Kreidler fined the following insurance producers for violating state laws:

  David M. Connolly and David Connolly Insurance Agency, Silverdale, Wash.; fined $500, order 18-0355

  Ryan M. Focht, Pullman, Wash.; fined $500, order 18-0482

  Alina Frenkel, Bellevue, Wash.; fined $500, order 18-0483

  Robert L. Johnston, Spokane, Wash.; fined $500, order 18-0491

  Paul F. Dent and Griffin Mac Lean, Inc., Bellevue, Wash.; fined $1,000, order 18-0488

  John C. Haskell, Jr., Mill Creek, Wash.; fined $250, order 18-0397

  Xandrea Powell, Suwanee, Ga.; fined $250, order 18-0395

  Terran Watters-Fletcher, Lawrencville, Ga.; fined $250, order 18-0401

  Benchmark Administrators LLC, Wayzata, Minn.; fined $250, order 18-0429

  Lawrence M. Koresko, Collegeville, Penn.; fined $250, order 18-0436

  George Lewis Kengle, Springfield, Ore.; fined $250, order 18-0478

  Thomas A. Dus, Elyria, Ohio; fiend $500, order 18-0506


Continuing education providers

  Risk & Insurance Managers Society of Washington, Seattle; fined $800, order 18-0513





Source link: Washington Department of Insurance

Tags:  Around the PIA Western Alliance States  insurance content  insurance news  Weekly Industry News 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Around the PIA Western Alliance States

Posted By staff reporter, Tuesday, January 22, 2019


Lara & Federal Shutdown: Insurance Commissioner Ricardo Lara strongly urges that insurance companies assist Californians who are affected by the Federal Government shutdown and may face delays in paying premiums or cancellation of policies. The Commissioner is asking insurers to be patient and work with these California residents during this difficult time.

 “The Federal shutdown is putting Californians at unnecessary risk of losing insurance coverage over late or unpaid bills,” said Commissioner Lara. “I am asking insurers to partner with me to protect our federal workers and contractors in California to give them some peace of mind during this time of uncertainty.”

The partial shutdown of the Federal Government is negatively affecting many California consumers, specifically those employed by the Federal Government and contractors who are not being paid their regular salary or receiving reimbursements when normally due. This delay in payment affects these consumers’ ability to pay their bills on time including insurance coverage, mortgages or other loans.

Commissioner Lara asks insurers to take into consideration the difficulties California consumers are facing and will continue to face until the current shutdown has ended. He urges insurers to relax due dates for premium payments, extend grace periods, waive late fees and penalties, allow forbearance with regard to the cancellation/non-renewal of policies, allow payment plans for premium payments, and exercise judicious efforts to assist affected policyholders and work with them to make sure that their insurance policies do not lapse.

Source link: California Department of Insurance


Medicare Workshops: Free Medicare Workshops for individuals turning 65 and those approaching Medicare eligibility have been scheduled in two Idaho cities.

The first is Thursday, January 24 from 2:30 p.m. to 4 p.m. at the Syringa Hospital Soltman Center, 600 W. Main St., Grangeville, Idaho. 

The second is Monday, January 28, from 6 p.m. to 7:30 p.m. at the St. Joseph’s Regional Medical Center, 415 6th St., Lewiston, Idaho.

Caregivers and all those interested in learning how Medicare works are encouraged to attend.

 The workshop will be led by Senior Health Insurance Benefits Advisors (SHIBA), a unit of the Idaho Department of Insurance. SHIBA presenters will introduce the various parts of Medicare and explain some of the vocabulary associated with the program. 

Topics to be covered include:

• Timeframes for enrolling in Medicare

• Enrollment periods for Medigap, Medicare Advantage and Prescription Drug Plans

• How the different parts of Medicare work together – and when they don’t

 To register for the workshops, please contact the SHIBA office at 1-800-247-4422.


Highway Fatalities: the Department of Public Safety is worried. Nevada’s highway fatalities rose to a 10-year high. The department said 331 people died 2018 in 301 crashes.

Department spokesman Andrew Bennett said most of them were in Clark County. “In 2008 we were at 324, then we dropped to the mid 200s from about 2009 to 2013 and we then we saw a steady climb into the 300s in 2014,” he said. “So, 331 is on the high end in the last decade, but we have seen a 4 percent population growth over the past two years in the state as well.”

Pedestrian deaths in Nevada dropped from 98 in 2017 o 80 last year. Bennett said it is the first decrease in nine years.

Source link: Insurance Journal


The Commissioner’s 2019 legislative priorities: Surprise billing (HB 1065 and SB 5031 "Protecting consumers from charges for out-of-network health care services")

This legislation will stop patients from getting an additional bill, after the patient’s health plan has paid the normal rate and the patient has paid their portion (such as a co-pay) when they receive medical care for an emergency at an out-of-network emergency room and when they have an approved surgery at an in-network hospital or surgery center but receive services, such as anesthesiology, radiology or lab services, from a provider who is out-of-network.

The prime sponsor of HB 1065 is Rep. Cody. The prime sponsor of SB 5031 is Sen. Rolfes.

HB complete bill language (leg.wa.gov) (PDF, 181.46 KB)

   HB bill history (leg.wa.gov)

   HB Status: Public Hearing, January 23, 2019, 1:30pm

   SB complete bill language (leg.wa.gov) (PDF, 176.78 KB)

   SB bill history (leg.wa.gov)

   SB Status: Referred to Health & Long Term Care Committee

Disaster resilience working group (HB 1040 and SB 5106 "Concerning the creation of a work group to study and make recommendations on natural disaster mitigation and resiliency activities")

This legislation will create a work group composed of legislators, state agencies, insurance companies and other key stakeholders to review and make recommendations on how to best coordinate and improve disaster resiliency work in Washington State, including possibly creating a central place for coordination and planning.

The prime sponsor of HB 1040 is Rep. Reeves. The prime sponsor of SB 5106 is Sen. Das.

  HB complete bill language (PDF, 68.24 KB)

   HB bill history (leg.wa.gov)

   HB Status: Public Hearing, January 16, 2019, 8:00am/Executive Session, January 22, 2019, 10:00am/Executive Session, January 23, 2019, 8:00am

   SB complete bill language (leg.wa.gov)

   SB bill history (leg.wa.gov)

   SB Status: Public Hearing, January 15, 2019, 8:00am/Executive Action, January 17, 2019, 8:30am

Medicare access and CHIP Reauthorization Act of 2015 (MACRA) (SB 5032 "Concerning Medicare supplemental insurance policies")

This legislation will align Washington law with recent changes in the Medicare and Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) statutes, which seek to prevent overutilization of services. Washington must have these changes in place by January 1, 2020. The two key changes are:

As of January 1, 2020, new enrollees will no longer be able to purchase a Medicare Supplement Plan which provides coverage for the Part B deductible. This does not impact existing enrollees.

Allow but not require companies to offer a new Plan G with a High Deductible option. Currently, only Plan F has an additional High Deductible option.

The prime sponsor of SB 5032 is Sen. Cleveland.

   SB complete bill language (leg.wa.gov) (PDF, 86.39 KB)

   SB bill history (leg.wa.gov)

   SB Status: Public Hearing, January 18, 2019, 8:00am

Criminal Investigations Unit (CIU) Separate Funding (HB 1069 "Concerning the creation of the insurance fraud surcharge account")

This legislation will create a dedicated funding stream for the Office of the Insurance Commissioner’s (OIC) Criminal Investigation Unit (CIU), who are charged with investigating and preventing insurance fraud. The legislation will also increase that funding to allow CIU to keep up with the increasing amount of fraud referrals by adding five new staff. The funding will be provided by dedicating a portion of the premium surcharge already collected by the OIC for CIU’s exclusive use.

The prime sponsor of HB 1069 is Rep. Stanford

   HB complete bill language (leg.wa.gov) (PDF, 82.11 KB)

   HB bill history (leg.wa.gov)

   HB Status: Public Hearing, January 16, 2019, 1:30pm/Executive Session, January 18, 2019, 9:00am

Source link: Washington Department of Insurance

Kreidler and Innovators: Washington Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler is offering innovators in the insurance industry a new way to engage his office about potential products that may benefit consumers.

Kreidler announced an insurance innovation portal, Resources for insurance industry innovators.

Click here to access the portal that includes guidelines, a hotline and web form. This is designed to encourage companies, agents and insurance startups to contact his office early in the development of new products.

Kreidler noted that changing social and technological trends have created an opportunity for insurance entrepreneurs. 

“The insurance industry is constantly evolving and we want to make sure innovators understand the laws that guide insurance regulation in Washington,” Kreidler said. “We are eager to work with innovators as they prepare to bring products to market. We’re committed to fair and efficient regulation.”

The Office of the Insurance Commissioner regulates Washington’s $42 billion insurance industry. For more information, please visit www.insurance.wa.gov

Source link: Washington Department of Insurance

Tags:  Around the PIA Western Alliance States  insurance content  insurance industry 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Insurance Rates — 2018’s Fourth Quarter

Posted By s, Tuesday, January 15, 2019

Both MarketScout and the IVANS Index have released statistics for the last quarter of 2018. Both groups say nearly all commercial insurance lines saw rate increases.

The data firm IVANS — who gathers data from 32,000 agencies and 380 insurers — said the only real area of concern is workers’ compensation. The average rate dropped and is still in the negative but commercial auto, general liability, commercial property and umbrella all saw rates rise.


Here are the highlights of the IVANS report:

Commercial Auto: Rates rose 4.66% in the fourth quarter. October’s 4.81% jump was the highest and December’s 4.51% the lowest.

Business Owners Policy: The average change for the quarter was 4.23%. That’s up from the 4.13% of the third quarter.

General liability: The average jump in the fourth quarter is 2.54%.

Commercial property: The average increase was 3.74% compared to 3.34% in the third quarter. December’s 3.95% was the highest jump.

Umbrella: Rates are up 2.42% compared to the third quarter’s 1.93%. The 2.76% rise in November is the highest increase.

As for worker’s compensation, it was in the negative all year. The average change in the quarter is minus 3.04%. That’s down from the terrible drop of 2.76% in the third quarter. Another negative is workers’ compensation rates were worse in all of 2018 than what we experienced in 2017.

May of 2017 was the last increase in workers’ compensation rates.

IVANS vice president Brian Wood said, “The end of 2018 experienced the greatest change in premium renewal rates from the year prior for nearly all major commercial lines products.”

MarketScout’s CEO Richard Kerr said all commercial lines had a rate rise averaging 2% in the fourth quarter. He said by industry class, transportation saw the biggest increase at 6% and contractors rose 2.5%.

“Ample capacity remains in the commercial insurance market. Rates for all coverage classifications other than workers compensation are increasing at a controlled, slow pace,” Kerr said. “Only transportation and commercial auto exposures are suffering large rate increases.”

As for overall accounts in the fourth quarter:

  Small accounts (up to $25,000 in premium) saw a 2.5% jump

  Medium accounts ($25,001 to $250,000) showed rates rising 1.5%

  Large accounts ($250,001 to $1 million) saw rates rise 2.5%

  Jumbo accounts ($1 million or more) found rates up 2%


Source links: Insurance Journal, Business Insurance

Tags:  insurance content  insurance rates  IVANS report  liability 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Volcanoes in the U.S. — A Mountain of Danger

Posted By staff reporter, Tuesday, January 15, 2019


We all know about Hawaii’s Kilauea volcano and the problems it has been causing in that state. It’s not stable but it’s also not the classic mountain. In fact, we tend to think of the mountains as being permanent and safe.

They are anything but safe and as those living around Washington State’s Mt. St. Helens on May 18, 1980 will tell you, they can be downright dangerous.

All that said, the U.S. Geological Survey says there are 18 volcanoes in the United States that are a very high threat. Mt. St. Helens is number-two on the list followed by Washington’s Mt. Rainier.

Janine Krippner is a volcano expert from West Virginia’s Concord University. She said, “This report may come as a surprise to many, but not to volcanologists. The USA is one of the most active countries in the world when it comes to volcanic activity.”

How dangerous a volcano is is based on several factors:

  How explosive can it be?

  How recently has it erupted?

  How often does it erupt?

  Is there current seismic activity around the volcano?

  How many people are nearby?

  How difficult is an evacuation?

  Will an eruption disrupt air traffic?

For those of us in the PIA Western Alliance, the report says 11 of the 18 most dangerous volcanoes in the country are in Oregon, Washington and California. Mt. Rainier is probably the most dangerous since about 300,000 people are in the volcano’s hazard zone.

Here are the most dangerous volcanoes in the nation:

1. Kilauea — Hawaii

2. Mt. St. Helens — Washington

3. Mt. Rainier — Washington

4. Redoubt Volcano — Alaska

5. Mt. Shasta — California

6. Mt. Hood — Oregon

7. Three Sisters — Oregon

8. Akutan Island — Alaska

9. Makushin Volcano — Alaska

10. Mt. Spurr — Alaska

11. Lassan Volcano Center California

12. Augustine Volcano — Alaska

13. Newberry Volcano — Oregon

14. Mt. Baker — Washington

15. Glacier Peak — Washington

16. Mauna Loa — Hawaii

17. Crater Lake — Oregon

18. Long Valley Caldera California

Most of the others 19 - 41 are in Alaska


Source links: US News & World Report, US Geological Survey

Tags:  insurance content  natural disaster  Volcanos 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

Around the PIA Western Alliance States

Posted By Staff Reporter, Tuesday, January 8, 2019




Regulations on Gender Discrimination in Auto Insurance: California Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones has issued new regulations that prohibit the use of gender in private passenger automobile insurance rating in California. The Gender Non-Discrimination in Automobile Insurance Rating Regulation became effective on January 1, 2019.

“My priority as Insurance Commissioner is to protect all California consumers, and these regulations ensure that auto insurance rates are based on factors within a driver’s control, rather than personal characteristics over which drivers have no control,” said Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones.

This is not the first regulatory action Commissioner Jones has taken to prevent gender-based discrimination in California’s insurance industry. In 2012, the Commissioner promulgated regulations that prohibit and prevent the denial of coverage or denial of claims for medical services based upon an insured or prospective insured’s actual or perceived gender identity. Prior to his election as Insurance Commissioner, then Assemblymember Jones authored legislation (Assembly Bill 119, in 2009) to prohibit gender-based discrimination in the pricing of health insurance. Thanks to that law, California eliminated gender-based pricing in health insurance before that became the national standard under the Affordable Care Act.

The Commissioner’s Gender Non-Discrimination in Automobile Insurance Rating Regulation mandates that all automobile insurance companies operating in California file a revised class plan that eliminates the use of gender as a rating factor.

Source link: California Department of Insurance


New Regs on Average Medical Service Contract Rate: Under the leadership of Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones, the California Department of Insurance adopted new regulations to implement provisions of Assembly Bill 72 (Chapter 492, Statutes of 2016). These regulations relate to the average contracted rate that a non-contracted medical professional will be paid when an insured seeks medical services at an in-network medical facility and is treated by an out-of-network provider. These average contracted rate regulations were approved by the Office of Administrative Law (OAL) and go into effect on January 1, 2019.

AB 72 protects consumers from surprise medical bills when they go to an in-network health facility and receive care from an out-of-network provider without specifically consenting to out-of-network care. The law also establishes a payment amount of 125 percent of the Medicare rate or the average contracted rate in that geographic region for that out-of-network medical service, whichever of the two is greater. These new regulations issued by the department provide the methodology for determining the "average contacted rate" for the medical service that insurers must use to reimburse non-contracting medical professionals. This will reduce disputes between insurers and medical providers about reimbursement rates for non-contracted medical care by providing a clear methodology for rate calculation for commonly billed services at in-network medical facilities.

Under these new regulations, the average contracted rate will be the average of the contracted commercial rates paid by a health insurer for the same or similar health care services in the baseline year (2015) in the geographic region in which the service was provided, with the rate then adjusted for inflation based on the date the medical service was provided.

"These regulations were carefully crafted to provide a fair way of calculating the average contracted rate for medical services in a given geographic region in those circumstances in which a patient inadvertently receives care from an out-of-network provider. Insurers are required to maintain an adequate provider network to ensure timely access to care for their policyholders and when patients are forced to go out-of-network at an in-network facility, the patient should not have to pay more for their care and the providers should be reimbursed fairly," explained Commissioner Jones.

The consumer protection in AB 72 that prevents policyholders from surprise medical bills for non-emergency care went into effect on July 1, 2017, and ensures that when consumers seek medical care at a facility in their insurer's network, but receive care from an out-of-network medical provider, they only have to pay their in-network cost sharing. The law also called for the Insurance Commissioner to set up an Independent Dispute Resolution (IDR) system that providers can use if they do not believe they have been paid fairly under the law. The IDR program was developed by the department for use by medical providers and insurers starting in September 1, 2017.

Source link: California Department of Insurance


Supreme Court Decision Fair Claims

 After a decade of legal wrangling over the regulations that implement the Unfair Insurance Practices Act (UIPA), the California Supreme Court let stand the decision of California Court of Appeal, 4th Appellate District, upholding the Insurance Commissioner's Fair Claims Settlement Practices Regulations, which prescribe how insurance companies must process insurance claims. The regulations are the foundation in determining the number of violations committed when assessing fines against insurers that have committed unfair claims practices.

Department of Insurance examinations of PacifiCare's claims-handling uncovered evidence of numerous unfair claims practices-which included wrongful denials for life-saving treatment for people battling serious illness and claim payment denials for providers and hospitals-all because the insurer was focused on maximizing profits through what it called "efficiencies" after the 2015 botched $9 billion acquisition of PacifiCare by UnitedHealthcare. The Department examinations also uncovered evidence the company was well aware of the egregious issues.

Under the Insurance Code, these unfair acts or practices include misrepresenting what medications or treatments an insurance policy covers, failing to promptly pay claims where liability is reasonably clear, and forcing claimants to file lawsuits to get full payment, and other acts. The Insurance Code allows the commissioner to impose fines of up to $5,000 each time an insurer commits an unfair act or practice on a consumer, or up to $10,000 each time if the insurer did so willfully.

"UnitedHealthcare purchased PacifiCare and imposed cost-cutting measures that destroyed PacifiCare's claims-handling processes and its arguments in litigation that insurance companies should be allowed to willfully harm consumers as long as they don't do it too often, reflect a gross disregard of the lives and well-being of the consumers who paid for the promise of coverage," Commissioner Jones said. "Customers have no choice but to rely on the integrity of their health insurance companies. PacifiCare breached that trust. By any measure, 908,000 violations reflect a general business practice of violating consumer protection laws. I am delighted the Supreme Court has rejected further challenges to the insurance commissioner's authority to punish insurance companies for knowingly harming even one consumer."

Based on departmental examination results and following an administrative hearing that took three years, Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones found PacifiCare committed 908,547 separate violations of the UIPA, and he imposed fines aggregating $173,603,750 in penalties. On behalf of PacifiCare, UnitedHealthcare sued the commissioner, arguing that none of its harmful conduct violated the Insurance Code.

PacifiCare argued that insurers are immune from fines for committing these unfair acts, even if the insurer did so intentionally, unless the commissioner is also able to show that the insurer knew it had committed the acts frequently enough to constitute a "general business practice." The court of appeal rejected the argument, stating: "PacifiCare's interpretation of section 790.03(h) is not only internally problematic, it stands in contrast to virtually every other statute the Legislature has enacted in connection with (1) enforcement of the Insurance Code against insurers generally; (2) enforcement of the UIPA in particular; and (3) the imposition of administrative penalties against insurers in other contexts."

The court also rejected PacifiCare's argument that the commissioner must prove an insurer had "actual knowledge" of its illegal conduct and held that it was within the commissioner's authority to hold the insurer responsible if its agents or employees were aware of facts that would cause a reasonable person to know of the violations. The court also found the commissioner's reasoning was sensible in that restricting the definition of "knowingly" to one particular individual's actual knowledge would fail to take into account that many people handle a claim, and an unfair practice can be committed by cumulative acts, not simply the intentional act of one person."

Further, the court of appeal also upheld the commissioner's interpretation that an insurer's "willful" violation of the act may be established by showing a purpose or willingness to commit the act and agreed that penalties for willful violations do not need to require a showing that the insurer intended to violate the law or injure someone. The court held, "As the Commissioner points out, he engaged in an extensive, formal rulemaking process in the course of promulgating these regulations. That careful consideration, combined with the Commissioner's expertise in the area, weighs in favor of according significant deference to the Commissioner's interpretation of the terms, and we do so."

Source link: California Department of Insurance


Wells Fargo Settlement

 Wells Fargo has agreed to pay a $10 million penalty as part of a settlement agreement with the California Department of Insurance. This settlement resolves the department’s accusation alleging improper insurance sales practices related to Wells Fargo’s online insurance referral program. The improper practices resulted in consumers being signed up and charged for insurance products without their consent.

“The Department of Insurance’s investigation found that Wells Fargo was signing up and charging customers for insurance without their consent,” said Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones. “Banks and other financial institutions should never be allowed to prey on their customers’ trust without being held accountable.”

Wells Fargo has agreed to not transact any new business during the remaining term of its two insurance licenses, which expire in July and September 2020, respectively. The company also agreed to not apply for a license for at least two years following the expiration of their current licenses. Wells Fargo has provided restitution to all California consumers who were charged premiums, bank fees and other direct monetary losses connected to the unauthorized insurance policies.

$5 million of the penalty is due immediately. If the company ever seeks to return to the California insurance marketplace, it will then pay the remaining $5 million penalty. The Department may also decline to issue a new license.

In November 2017, the department served on Wells Fargo an accusation seeking revocation of Wells Fargo’s insurance license for improper insurance sales practices. The accusation was the result of an investigation opened at the direction of Insurance Commissioner Dave Jones, which found that from 2008 to 2016, Wells Fargo customers were issued approximately 1,500 insurance policies without their knowledge or permission. In some cases, employees told consumers to enter their personal information on a policy application merely to receive a quote, but Wells Fargo employees later submitted the application to the insurer to purchase the policy without the consumer’s permission.

Source link: California Department of Insurance



Drunk Driver Interlock Law

Starting this year ignition interlock devices are required for the vehicles of all drivers getting a first-time drunken driving conviction. The device will be connected to the vehicle for one-year.

In the past, the blow-into-a-mouthpiece device was only required for repeat offenders.


Source link: Insurance Journal



Marijuana Sales: The Nevada Department of Taxation says marijuana sales in the state are quite brisk. October’s figures were released late last year and sales hit $42 million. That means $8.24 million in tax revenue for the state.

Sales from July through October of 2018 were almost half of the projected sales for the entire year.

Revenues are expected to go even higher since the state issued 61 more dispensary licenses in December bringing the total to 65.

Source link: Insurance Journal



Off Duty Pot Use for State Workers

The Oregon Legislature is considering a bill that will make it illegal to fire an employee who fails a marijuana drug test if they used marijuana while off the clock.

The rationale is that it is unfair to penalize an employee for using a substance that is legal to use in the state.

Senate Bill 301 will not allow employees to use marijuana if their collective bargaining agreement says they cannot do that even while not working. So exemptions are in the bill for labor agreements, workers who are under the influence while working or from federal jobs that require employees to have a drug free workplace in order to receive federal dollars.

Source link: Insurance Journal


From the Department of Insurance: The Oregon Division of Financial Regulation recently adopted the following rule: ID 39-2018: Establishes reimbursement rates for out-of-network services provided at in-network health care facilities


Rules affected: OAR 836-150-0010, 836-150-0020, 836-150-0030, 836-150-0040, 836-150-0050, 836-150-0060


Rule Summary: Clarifies the purpose, statutory authority, and applicability for OAR 836-053-1600 to 836-053-1615. Adopt definitions of: anesthesia conversion factor; base units; base rate; CMS; CPT; CPI adjustment; director; geographic rating area; modifier adjustment; out-of-network reimbursement; physical status units; Q modifier adjustment; and time units. Adopt formula for out-of-network reimbursement for non-anesthesia-related claims. Adopt formula for out-of-network reimbursement for anesthesia-related claims.

Filed: December 19, 2018

Effective: January 1, 2019


Permanent Administrative Order — https://dfr.oregon.gov/laws-rules/Documents/id39-2018_rule-order.pdf

Summary of Testimony and Hearing Officer's Report — https://dfr.oregon.gov/laws-rules/Documents/id39-2018_ho-rec.pdf

Appendix A: Non-anesthesia reimbursement base rate — https://dfr.oregon.gov/laws-rules/Documents/OAR/div53-1605_exA.pdf


The Oregon Division of Financial Regulation recently adopted the following rule: ID 38-2018: Implementing the Oregon Reinsurance Program


Rules affected: OAR 836-150-0010, 836-150-0020, 836-150-0030, 836-150-0040, 836-150-0050, 836-150-0060


Rule Summary: Explains the purpose of the Oregon Reinsurance Program. Defines benefit year, department, reinsurance eligible claim, reinsurance eligible issuer and reinsurance payment. Lists the reporting requirements and payment processes to receive reinsurance payments. Establishes the attachment point, reinsurance cap and coinsurance rate for the benefit years 2018 and 2019. Describes how and when reinsurance payments are to be made. Describes the duties of the Oregon Reinsurance Program administrator.


Filed: December 19, 2018

Effective: January 1, 2019


Permanent Administrative Order — https://dfr.oregon.gov/laws-rules/Documents/id38-2018_rule-order.pdf

Summary of Testimony and Hearing Officer's Report — https://dfr.oregon.gov/laws-rules/Documents/id38-2018_ho-rec.pdf


The Oregon Division of Financial Regulation recently adopted the following rule: ID 37-2018: Update to adoption of the Valuation Manual for principle-based reserving

Rules affected: OAR 836-031-0605

Rule Summary: Designates the version of the Valuation Manual insurers must use in establishing principle-based reserves beginning January 1, 2019, and confirms that the operative date of the Valuation Manual is January 1, 2017 under section 16(2) of Oregon Laws 2015 chapter 547.

Filed: December 19, 2018

Effective: January 1, 2019


Permanent Administrative Order — https://dfr.oregon.gov/laws-rules/Documents/id37-2018_rule-order.pdf

Summary of Testimony and Hearing Officer's Report — https://dfr.oregon.gov/laws-rules/Documents/id37-2018_ho-rec.pdf


The Oregon Division of Financial Regulation recently adopted the following rule: ID 36-2018: Adoption of 2018 annual and 2019 quarterly statement blanks and instructions for insurers

Rules affected: OAR 836-011-0000

Rule Summary: Amended annually to prescribe the statement blanks and applicable instructions then in effect.

Filed: December 19, 2018

Effective: January 1, 2019



Permanent Administrative Order — https://dfr.oregon.gov/laws-rules/Documents/id36-2018_rule-order.pdf

Summary of Testimony and Hearing Officer's Report — https://dfr.oregon.gov/laws-rules/Documents/id36-2018_ho-rec.pdf


The Oregon Division of Financial Regulation recently adopted the following rule: ID 35-2018: Update to morbidity standards for valuation of individual and group health insurance policies

Rules affected: OAR 836-031-0270

Rule Summary: The rule sets forth the minimum standards to be used by insurers for the valuation of specified benefits, and the computation of contract reserves and claim reserves, for individual and group health insurance policies.

Filed: December 19, 2018

Effective: December 19, 2018



Permanent Administrative Order — https://dfr.oregon.gov/laws-rules/Documents/id35-2018_rule-order.pdf

Summary of Testimony and Hearing Officer's Report — https://dfr.oregon.gov/laws-rules/Documents/id35-2018_ho-rec.pdf


Establishment of Oregon Prescription Drug Price Transparency Program, reporting requirements, fees, civil penalties

Rules affected: OAR OAR 836-053-0473, 836-200-0500, 836-200-0505, 836-200-0510, 836-200-0515, 836-200-0520, 836-200-0525, 836-200-0530, 836-200-0535, 836-200-0540, 836-200-0545, 836-200-0550, 836-200-0555, 836-200-0560

Need for Rules:

The Prescription Drug Price Transparency Act (2018 Oregon House Bill 4005, enrolled at 2018 Oregon Laws, Chapter 7) directs the Department of Consumer and Business Services (DCBS) to establish a reporting program for prescription drug manufacturers and health insurance carriers to increase the transparency of prescription drug pricing in Oregon. This program will be known as the Oregon Prescription Drug Price Transparency program. The law directs DCBS to engage in rulemaking to define key terms and timelines, and empowers DCBS to establish fees, adopt a schedule of civil penalties for violations and adopt any other rules necessary for carrying out the provisions of Section 2 of the law.

The proposed rule establishes:

  Definitions for key terms including “new prescription drug,” “net annual increase,” “one month supply” and “course of treatment” that clarify the circumstances when a report is required;

  Form, manner and content requirements for reports from drug manufacturers;

  DCBS’s supervisory expectations of participating drug manufacturers, including good faith standards;

  Timelines for DCBS to request additional information relating to drug manufacturer reports, and for manufacturers’ responses;

  DCBS’s process for adjudicating trade secret claims from drug manufacturers;

  Timelines for DCBS to make drug manufacturer reports publicly available, subject to applicable trade secret exemptions;

  DCBS’s process for receiving notices from consumers about prescription drug price increases;

  Establishing an annual $400 fee for drug manufacturers, as well as an additional surcharge fee for manufacturers that file reports with DCBS;

  Adopting a schedule of civil penalties for drug manufacturer violations; and

  Requirements for information on drug pricing to be provided by health insurance carriers in rate filings.

The proposed rules are necessary to ensure that the program is administered in a fair and equal manner for all participating drug manufacturers and health insurance carriers, to minimize the administrative burden and cost of the program for the state and the industry, and to achieve the program’s purpose of providing notice and disclosure of information relating to the cost and pricing of prescription drugs in order to provide accountability for prescription drug pricing.

Filed: December 28, 2018

Public hearing: January 22, 2019, 10:00 a.m.

Last day for public comment: February 1, 2019, 5 p.m.

The agency requests public comment on whether other options should be considered for achieving the rule's substantive goals while reducing the negative economic impact of the rule on business.


For more information on this proposed rule and others, please visit the Division's website:




The Department of Insurance Issues Fines: Insurance Commissioner Mike Kreidler disciplined and issued fines in November 2018 totaling $700,500 against insurance companies, agents, brokers and others who violated state insurance regulations.

Insurance companies

Dental Health Services, Seattle; fined $500,000, order 18-0437

Kreidler fined the dental insurer for:

  Failing to identify and process 23 policyholders’ appeals.

  Failing to identify and process 342 grievances from policyholders.

  Erroneously canceling polices.

  Double-charging 492 policyholders a total of $56,351. The company refunded the money with an additional $5,635 in interest.

  Failing to deliver enrollment materials to 76 policyholders.

In addition to the fine, Kreidler will prohibit the company from selling new policies for at least 12 months. After the probationary period, the company can ask Kreidler to allow it to sell policies if it completes compliance and corrective action plans to the commissioner’s satisfaction. Kreidler is suspending $400,000 of the fine and will impose additional penalties if the company fails to comply with the terms of the order.

Kreidler previously took action against Dental Health Services in 2017 and 2018. Kreidler fined the company $400,000 for mishandling consumer complaints and other issues.


American Pet Insurance Co., New York City; fined $10,000, order 16-0127

Kreidler imposed $10,000 of a suspended fine against the pet insurance company for failing to follow the compliance plan it agreed to in July 2016. The plan includes a self-audit, which revealed that one policyholder was charged the incorrect premium and eight policyholders did not receive the required 30-day notice for a rate change. Kreidler previously suspended $100,000 of the $250,000 to ensure compliance with the terms of the order. This is the first portion of the suspended fine that Kreidler has imposed on the company.


Kreidler disciplined the following companies for violating state insurance regulations:

  Country Mutual Insurance Co., Bloomington, Ill.; fined $50,000, order 18-0409

  Nationwide Agribusiness Insurance Co., Des Moines, Iowa; fined $25,000, order 18-0425

  Amica Mutual Insurance Co., Lincoln, R.I.; fined $20,000, order 18-0424

  Zurich American Insurance Co., New York City; fined $20,000, order 16-0107

  Horace Mann Insurance Co., Springfield, Ill.; fined $10,000, order 18-0408

  Garrison Property & Casualty Insurance Co., San Antonio, Texas; fined $10,000, order 18-0433

  Stillwater Insurance Co., Santa Barbara, Calif.; fined $10,000, order 18-0474

  Allied World Specialty Insurance Co., Wilmington, Del.; fined $3,500, order 18-0458

  Amica Mutual Insurance Co., Lincoln, R.I.; fined $3,000, order 18-0444


Agents and brokers

Kreidler disciplined the following insurance producers for violating state insurance regulations:

  Michelle F. Boyer, Parker, Colo.; fined $2,500, order 18-0390

  Rashun Mann, Mansfield, Texas; fined $500, order 18-0380

  Reed Jeff Insurance Agency and Jeffrey Reed, Silverdale, Wash.; fined $250, order 18-0363

  Steele Group Insurance Agency, Inc., and Kelly S. Steele, Eugene, Ore.; fined $250, order 18-0416

  Gentry Partners Ltd.; Greenwich, Conn.; fined $250, order 18-0440

  Bruce Gilchrist, San Carlos, Calif.; fined $250, order 18-0396

  Larry P. Chinn, Memphis, Tenn.; license revoked, order 18-0398

  Kathy Ann Graham, Fort Pierce, Fla.; license revoked, order 18-0427

  Andrea Godoy, Clovis, Calif.; license revoked, order 18-0428

  Tiana Tam, Everett, Wash.; probationary license issued, order 18-0438

  Kiara Munguia, Las Vegas; license revoked, order 18-0445

  Juan Alberto Porras, Phoenix; license revoked, order 18-0430

  Glenn Chavious, Hull, Mass.; license revoked, order 18-0431

  Bijan Richards, Omaha; license revoked, order 18-0432

  April Holmes, Mesa, Ariz.; license revoked, order 18-0435


Other organizations

  Credit Acceptance Corp., Southfield, Mich.; fined $30,000, order 18-0426

  Kreidler fined the company for selling nearly 10,000 guaranteed asset protection waivers to Washington consumers via car dealerships without being registered.

  Device Doctorz of Clermont LLC, dba Insure Apple, Oviedo, Fla.; ordered to cease and desist, order 18-0462; fined $5,000, order 18-0463

A Washington state consumer complained to Kreidler’s office when Insure Apple denied his claim for the loss of his iPhone. Upon review, the commissioner found the company sold insurance without a license in Washington state. Altogether, it illegally sold 37 policies for $4,436 in premiums.


Source link: Washington Department of Insurance


Workers’ Compensation Price Drop

The Washington Department of Insurance said the price for workers’ compensation is going to fall for most businesses in 2019.

Department L&I Director Joel Sacks said the drop will average about 5% and will be the largest drop in over 10-years. “We’re seeing fewer injuries on the job and we’ve made improvements in helping injured workers heal and return to work. That’s good news for workers and employers, and it’s helping us significantly lower workers’ compensation costs,” Sacks said.

Employers will pay about $58 less per employee. The drop for workers will average about $6 year. Estimated total premium savings for businesses in the state will be about $136 million in 2019.

Of course all of this changes from industry to industry. Some will pay more. Others less.

  Building and construction workers’ premiums will decrease by 9%

  Agricultural workers’ and food processors’ premiums will drop by 2%

  Healthcare workers’ premiums will fall by 4%

  Forest products workers’ premiums will go down 6%

  Government workers’ and school employees’ premiums will see a 3% drop

  Restaurant and hotel workers’ premiums will fall an estimated 6%

Not all areas will see a drop:

  City and county law enforcement officers’ premiums will rise by 8%

  City and county firefighters’ will see a 6% hike

Source link: Chinook Observer


Tags:  Around the PIA Western Alliance States  insurance content 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)

FEMA Reverses Course, Flood Insurance Program Resumes Normal Operations During Government Shutdown

Posted By Staff Reporter, Wednesday, January 2, 2019


Outcry Prompts Agency to Rescind Earlier Decision to Halt NFIP


Late Friday Dec. 28, the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) said insurers may resume the sale, renewal, and monetary endorsements for flood insurance policies.

In so doing, FEMA rescinded guidance issued two days earlier that insurers should no longer sell new policies backed by the flood insurance program during the government shutdown. A bipartisan group of lawmakers and business groups, including PIA, quickly pressed for a reversal of FEMA’s initial decision on Dec. 26 to halt flood insurance sales.

The stakeholders pointed out that FEMA’s action contradicted Congress’ passage of a six-month extension of the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) on the evening of Dec. 21, just hours before the government shutdown.

David I. Maurstad, Deputy Associate Administrator for Insurance and Mitigation with FEMA, issued a statement late Dec. 28, saying: 

"On December 26, 2018, FEMA informed you that due to a lapse in annual appropriation the NFIP may not sell new insurance policies, renew existing policies, or make monetary endorsements on existing policies. Effective immediately, this guidance is rescinded and NFIP Insurers may resume the sale, renewal, and monetary endorsements for flood insurance policies. Please treat the program as operational since December 21, 2018 without interruption. We appreciate your support, understanding, and patience these past few days.”

National Association of Professional Insurance Agents

419 North Lee Street, Alexandria, VA 22314-9980main 703.836.9340 | fax 703.836.1279 | www.pianet.com

Tags:  FEMA  Flood program  Insurance Content  Insurance News 

Share |
PermalinkComments (0)
Page 1 of 183
1  |  2  |  3  |  4  |  5  |  6  >   >>   >| 

A special thank you to our KKlub Members for their support.